CU 5007MKT Marketing Insight - Coursework 2 (Coffee Shop Industry)
Module No: 5007MKT
Module Title: Marketing Insight
Coursework 2 of 2 (50% of total module mark)
Report Word Length: maximum 4,000- excluding references, tables of contents and abstract
Reflection Word Length:maximum 500 words
Submission: 24th October 2025 @ 2359hrs
Background
The coffee shop industry in Singapore is a dynamic and competitive sector dominated by major international chains such as Starbucks and Coffee Bean, alongside a growing number of artisanal and independent coffee brands. While coffee consumption remains robust, independent players face increasing pressure from high overheads, shifting consumer behaviours, and rising expectations for convenience and quality. One such independent chain, Urban Grounds, believes enhancing customer retention is critical to sustaining growth. Management aims to assess how service quality, pricing, advertising strategies, and brand image influence customer loyalty in an increasingly saturated market.
Tasks
You have completed conducting online surveys among customers of Urban Grounds. Respondents were randomly selected from the company’s loyalty programme database. An initial invitation email was sent with a survey link, followed by two reminder emails. Out of 23,800 invited, 310 respondents completed the survey.
Project Requirements
You are to write a marketing research report for Urban Grounds’ management addressing all the factors in the study - price, advertising, brand image, service quality, and customer retention. The report should identify up to 10 themes aligned with the research objectives and include a maximum of three focus group questions per theme. Conduct appropriate statistical analyses to determine the significance of each factor in predicting customer retention. Analyse differences based on gender, age, household income, and working status. Conclude with insights and feasible recommendations and discuss the limitations of the research.
Learning Outcomes Assessed
1. Develop and design research to address a given business scenario.
2. Design quantitative and qualitative research instruments to address a research problem and apply data analysis techniques to find valid insights.
3. Conduct a marketing research project and critically analyze the findings and recommend solutions.
Contents of the Marketing Research Report
1. An abstract (max 250 words) summarising the industry background, business problem, research objectives, and key findings and recommendations (not included in word count).
2. The main report (~4,000 words ±10%):
· Introduction: Context of the coffee shop industry, business challenge at Urban Grounds, research aims.
· Qualitative Research: Up to 10 themes and 3 questions per theme for focus group discussions.
· Literature Review: Coverage of the research constructs (price, service quality, etc.), hypotheses development, and a conceptual framework.
· Methodology: Research and sampling methods, respondent demographics.
· Results and Analysis: Reliability tests, findings of statistical tests.
· Discussion: Theoretical implications, actionable recommendations for management.
· Limitations of the research study.
Reflection Report (500 words ±10%)
To be submitted separately. Should cover
· Most satisfying aspects of the project.
· Problems encountered and how they were solved.
· Useful resources
· Insights gained about the module.
· What you would do differently.
Note: Use the survey questionnaire in Appendix 1 for SPSS data formatting and statistical analysis. Do not attach the questionnaire in your report.
Each student must complete the peer evaluation form. in Appendix 2 and include it in their reflection report.
Marking Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Fail (0-39%)
|
Poor (40-49%)
|
Satisfactory (50-59%)
|
Good (60-69%)
|
Very Good (70-79%)
|
Excellent (80-100%)
|
|
Structure & Presentation (10%)
|
No logical structure. Poor presentation
|
Basic structure. Numerous presentation flaws
|
Structure evident but inconsistent. Some formatting issues
|
Clear structure. Good presentation with few errors
|
Logical flow, well-structured, well-presented
|
Excellent structure and presentation. Clear, professional, and engaging
|
|
Qualitative Research (20%)
|
No evidence of qualitative research.
|
Very limited or poorly executed research.
|
Some qualitative data presented but lacks depth.
|
Good application of qualitative methods. Moderate depth.
|
Strong application and integration of qualitative data.
|
Comprehensive, well-integrated, and insightful qualitative research.
|
|
Literature Review (25%)
|
No relevant literature reviewed.
|
Very limited use of literature. Little relevance.
|
Some relevant literature but lacking critical analysis.
|
Good range of literature. Some critical insight.
|
Strong and relevant literature. Good critique and synthesis.
|
Excellent coverage. Deep critical analysis and synthesis of literature.
|
|
Analysis & Recommendations (25%)
|
No analysis or recommendations.
|
Weak or unclear analysis. Recommendations lack basis.
|
Basic analysis. Recommendations not fully justified.
|
Good analysis with relevant recommendations.
|
Strong analysis. Recommendations are practical and well-supported.
|
Excellent critical analysis. Recommendations are innovative and well-grounded.
|
|
Reflection (20%)
|
No reflection evident.
|
Minimal personal insight.
|
Some personal reflection but superficial.
|
Good level of reflection with clear insight.
|
Strong reflection demonstrating learning and development.
|
Excellent, thoughtful reflection showing significant personal and academic growth.
|